O’Connor v. Oakhurst Dairy

An obscure court case from the First District Court of Appeals that was decided on the intent of a law around the lack of a comma, making the law ambiguous.

This case is an example of why OAJ suggests using the Oxford Comma, also known as a serial comma. However, most publications in the United States follow Associated Press style and omit the serial comma. In all cases, punctuation for clarity, part of accessibility, is better than omitting punctuation.

For the case, see FindLaw Case Law resources.

Also see comma.

← Return to Chapter O

User feedback survey

Please take a moment to tell use how you use the OAJ Style and Accessibility Guide.

Open survey
How I describe my profession. (Required)

Select as many as apply.

Where I work. (Required)

Select as many as apply.

How I use the OAJ Style and Accessibility Guide. (Required)

Select as many as apply.

How often I use the OAJ Style and Accessibility Guide. (Required)

Select only one.

Other guides I use. (Required)

Select as many as apply.

The information given within the Feedback Form will be used for service improvement only and are strictly confidential.

Thank you for your participation!

Didn’t find what you need?

Try searching the Style and Accessibility Guide in the box below

Donations build this guide

The Style and Accessibility Guide is built, maintained and free to use because people like you have generously donated to this project. Consider giving $5 a month — or any amount you choose.